Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

UK court rakes over government support for Mozambique LNG

© Shutterstock / corgarashuPost Thumbnail

The Court of Appeal will today hear a legal challenge over the Mozambique LNG project, from Friends of the Earth (FoE).

  • Friends of the Earth’s (FoE) legal action against UK Export Finance’s (UKEF) backing of a Mozambique gas project will be heard by the UK’s Court of Appeal.
  • Continued investment in fossil fuels is contradictory to the Paris Agreement.
  • The Court is expected to make its final ruling in early 2023.

A High Court heard the case in December 2021. The ruling, delivered in March this year, showed a difference of opinion between the two judges.

One judge found that UK Export Finance’s (UKEF) support for the Mozambique project was acceptable, dismissing concerns about the way in which scope 3 emissions had been calculated.

The second judge said UKEF had failed in its analysis. As a result, the agency had not given ministers sufficient information.

Today, the two sides will hash out the arguments once more.

FoE has said financing for Mozambique LNG was not compatible with the Paris Agreement, which serves to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. The decision to fund the gas project, the NGO has said, is therefore unlawful.

“UKEF not only helped finance the project but it failed to measure all the emissions it would produce – misleading ministers about the scale of its impact,” said FoE head of legal Will Rundle. “This is a complete failure of credible governance and morally unacceptable in a climate crisis.”

Assessments of fossil fuel projects must take into account all emissions, Rundle continued. Understanding the true climate impact of such a project was critical, he said. Such clarity would allow taxpayer money to go to funding renewable energy projects instead.

FoE international climate campaigner Rachel Kennerley said such gas projects had “wreaked havoc” on developing countries.

“A renewable development pathway is not only desired but possible, the UK must withdraw its support from Mozambique LNG,” she said. It is communities in areas such as Cabo Delgado that “are unfairly paying the highest price for climate breakdown.”

The court should deliver a decision in early 2023, FoE said.

More from SG Voice

Latest Posts