Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Influence Map’s Climate Policy Footprint 2022 highlights negative lobbying practices

© Shutterstock / CHUAN CHUANPost Thumbnail

Influence Map has published its 2022 Climate Policy Footprint, which identifies the 25 most negative and influential corporations globally in terms of their political lobbying and engagement. It represents those companies actively lobbying against climate action.

  • Influence Map identifies the most negative corporate political lobbyists against climate action.
  • Quantifying the gap between corporate targets and their actions, or those of their industry associations, helps identify bad actors.
  • Identifying the disconnect between net zero targets and corporate action is an important step towards transparency.

The importance of policy engagement when considering corporate climate performance should not be overlooked and highlights the gaps with mainstream corporate climate targets, indicators, and metrics.

For example, 80% of the 25 most negative and influential companies have made net-zero commitments, while 10 are given an A- or higher under CDP’s 2021 climate change disclosure scores. The assumption is that when a company has set a net zero target it is moving its operation towards alignment with the Paris goals.

Yet according to InfluenceMap data, only 10% of focus companies have broad alignment between their direct climate policy engagement activities and the Paris Agreementand only 4% align their indirect climate policy engagement via industry associations with the Paris Agreement. Changing that, or at least gaining transparency on what’s going on behind the scenes can help to align the trajectory of climate positive development.

Oil sector dominates anti-climate lobbying

It will come as no surprise that the US oil sector dominates the list, with supermajors Chevron and ExxonMobil retaining the top two spots and four other companies (ConocoPhillips, Marathon Petroleum, Valero and Phillips 66) also making the list.

Other oil and gas players identified in the analysis include two Russian companies, Gazprom (9th) and Rosneft (14th). The analysis appears to reflect the extent to which geopolitical events have impacted the development of science-based climate policy in 2022.

BASF has risen up the rankings to place 3rd this year (up from 6th in 2021). This analysis reflects intense European-level policy engagement from the German chemical giant over the last year. Other heavy industry players to make the list are focused in the steel sector, including two Japanese companies, Nippon Steel Corporation (8th) and JFE Steel (20th), alongside ArcelorMittal (22nd).

Another sector which stands out are US utilities, with six companies (Sempra Energy (5th), American Electric Power (6th), Southern Company (7th), Dominion Energy (13th) and Entergy Corp (25th) all making the top 25 most negative and powerful globally.

Placing 10th, Toyota remains the most negative and influential company from the Transport sector, having placed 3rd in 2021. Two German transport companies Lufthansa (15th) and BMW (16th) are also identified on the list, following the companies’ leading efforts to oppose EU climate regulations in 2021-22.


More from SG Voice

Latest Posts