Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Four ways to recognise a zero waste fashion business model

© ShutterstockPost Thumbnail

The fashion industry lacks a systemic approach to foster a truly sustainable business model. Zero Waste Europe (ZWE) has set four essential criteria to identify zero-waste fashion business models as an alternative to overconsumption.

  • ZWE is urging to look beyond product circularity and ecodesign to address the systemic issues of the fashion industry.
  • Today’s fast fashion business model is based on overconsumption, resource depletion, social exploitation, fossil-based fibres, and greenwash, and must be changed.
  • The report is one of the few pieces of literature on the topic, paving the way for further research and eventually the build-up of a consensus on best industry practices. 

Four criteria for zero waste fashion business models

In its report, Beyond Circular Fashion – a new business model for the fashion industry, non-profit organisation ZWE identifies four criteria for business models that fully comply with the circular economy and planetary boundaries. Researchers based their analysis on the best practices in the European market.

  1. Design for physical and emotional durability: garments should be both technically capable of enduring intensive use and many washing cycles, as well as living through trends to avoid going out of fashion, while being recyclable at the end of their life. One example in the report was Finland’s company R-Collection, whose garments have a timeless design, survive long-term usage and are easily maintained.
  2. Demand-driven production to phase out unsolds and discounts: between 10% and 60% of products are never sold or sold at discounted prices; between 20% and 30% of what is sold online is returned and rarely put back on sale. Changing the business model from a supply- to a demand-driven one will address the root cause of overproduction, while changing the cost structure of a business and allowing greater personalisation. French company Asphalte, for instance, regulates production based on demand, with a small surplus in order to address size issues.
  3. Full supply chain transparency and traceability post-sale: this can only be achieved if the company knows where components are sourced and how they were produced, as well as the fate of garments downstream and beyond. Endless supply chains, however, blur responsibility and make transparency harder – shorter, more local supply chains shorten the distance between the consumer and the producer. More transparency will force companies to rethink their ways, as child and labour exploitation, as well as the use of toxic products and additives, will be a lot more difficult to hide. RWE’s praised Italy’s Ragioniamo con i Piedi, which produces shoes and trainers locally with Italian products and manufacturing processes.
  4. Extending the use-phase after first ownership: this means that the company has a system to take back, repair, redye, remodel and/or recycle its own clothes so that, when reuse and repair are no longer an option, the fibres can go back to the producer. It also encourages mechanisms that allow for items to be reused over and over again, either through its own initiatives or external partners. Some examples were Germany’s Vaude, which provides guides for repairing its products, and Alpa, which has an online shop to resell the products returned by customers. The Swedish brand Polarn O. Pyret has a take-back for resale option and tips for repairing at home.

What’s wrong with the current business models?

The current model of fast fashion is one of the main drivers of overconsumption, resource depletion and social exploitation, with huge social and environmental consequences.

Just to name a few issues, textile production consumes around 98 million tons of non-renewable resources each year, requiring huge amounts of land, water and energy as well as toxic fertilisers, pesticides and chemical feedstocks. There are countless examples of exploitation of workers, child and forced labour, inadequate working conditions and pay, and a lack of social protection systems.

The EU has published a Textiles Strategy outlining plans to address these issues. Textile corporations have so far been unable to articulate a proper vision of what sustainable fashion systems could look like, according to ZWE. Think tanks such as the Ellen MacArthur Foundation have published proposals to address the topic, while non-governmental organisations have denounced the many inconsistencies and shortcomings of current performance and future plans.

There are some legislative initiatives intended to restructure the sector, mainly in the field of eco-design and waste management of textile products. Focusing on products and waste, however, does not tackle systemic factors or business models. Since overproduction is a systemic feature of a growth-dependent business model, the current legislative measures and the latest EU Textiles Strategy leave the most significant point unaddressed, ZWE said.

Researchers warned that the current push to increase the circularity of fashion products is a step in the right direction, but insufficient to change the current business models. As a result, given the additional resources that are often required to produce quality and lasting products, moving towards sustainable production could paradoxically lead to a higher environmental impact, if the model continues to be based on overproduction.

Paving the way for a new approach

ZWE’s report comes as one of the first pieces of literature on what are the features of a sustainable, fair, and zero-waste business model for textiles. This paves the way for further research and, eventually, consensus on how to transform the industry.

Researchers identified new fields to further investigate:

  • Gains, costs, and externalities associated to a radical change of current business model to one that is fair, sustainable, and zero waste; 
  • Fashion and climate – in particular, looking at the carbon budget available for the sector as a way to inform future legislative steps; 
  • Fashion and biodiversity – studying the impact of fast fashion on current biodiversity decline; 
  • Identification of existing best practices from a business model perspective; 
  • Design policies to encourage the transition to, or/and creation of, new businesses following the aforementioned criteria. 

Theresa Morsen, waste policy officer at ZWE, concluded: “With this report we are establishing guidance for businesses to become truly sustainable, ending overproduction and consumption to respect planetary boundaries. This will help scaling up sustainable business models and ZWE intends to empower pioneers in this field.”

More from SG Voice

Latest Posts